2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
One of mysterious questions is the source of helium in our universe. It is known that nuclear fusion can produce helium from hydrogen, deuterium and tritium[1-4]. However, there is difference between the estimated helium abundance and measured helium abundance in the universe[1]. It is believed that helium can only be generated in nuclear reaction under very high temperature and high pressure. But the fusion in the stars can not account for the abundance of helium in the universe. Now the excess of 4He in our universe is thought mainly from the Big-Bang in the very early period of our universe[1]. Nevertheless, there are several un-covered phenomena which can not be explained by our up to date knowledge. For example, scientists found that there were excess ratios of 3He and 4He in submarine hydrothermal water[5]. The question of energy balance of Jupiter seems also indicate the possibi-lity of low energy fusion reaction there[6]. Besides, It was found that trace amount of He could be produced by electrochemical method under normal conditions, so called cold fusion[7]. In that experiment, Fleischmann and Pons found 3He could be formed via electrochemical route from D2O. This implied that fusion could be achieved under mild conditions, i.e., collision of heavy hydrogen atoms to T:
$ {\rm{D}} + {\rm{D}} \to {\rm{T}}(1.01{\rm{MeV}}) + {\rm{H}}(3.02{\rm{MeV}}) $ | (1) |
$ {\rm{D}} + {\rm{D}}{ \to .3}{\rm{He}}(0.82{\rm{MeV}}) + {\rm{n}}(2.45{\rm{MeV}}) $ | (2) |
Where D is heavy hydrogen, T is tritium and n is neutron. Soon after this work, several hypotheses were present[8-9]. The rate of fusion is dependent on D nucleus distance. The shortest distance of D nucleus in Pd lattice is about 0.17~0.28 nm, therefore the fusion rate needs raise at least 50 orders of magnitude can reach Fleischmann and Pons' experiment results. Another is related to the change of the fusion reaction branching ratio. Based on the Bohr model, the reaction (a) and (b) rate was much larger than reaction (c), however, the experiment of Fleischmann and Pons showed that the reaction (c) is dominant (See Table 1).
Recently, we found that deuterium and helium could be produced during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water catalyzed by Pt-graphene sensitized with Br-dye under visible light irradiation. The detected amount of 3He increased with irradiation time increase. This work raises a mild route to generate deuterium and helium from proton in water. These results indicate that proton can be converted to He under very mild condition, under far below the nuclear fusion reaction condition, therefore, are very important because it may account for the difference between the estimated He abundance and measured He abundance in our universe, no matter the generation rate is high or low.
1 Experiments sectionAll chemicals were commercial purchased and used without further purification. Potassium chloroplatinate (K2PtCl6·6H2O, Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, AR, ≥99.5%), graphite powder (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., ≥99.8%), concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., ≥98.0%), potassium peroxydisulfate (K2S2O8, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., ≥99.5%), phosphorus oxide (P2O5, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., ≥98.0%), potassium permanganate (KMnO4, Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, AR, ≥99.5%), sodium nitrate (NaNO3, Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, AR, ≥99.5%), barium chloride (BaCl2, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., ≥99.8%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., 50%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., ≥85.0%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., 36%~38%), Eosin Y (EY, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., ≥85.0%), triethanolamine (TEOA, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., ≥98.0%), De-ionized water with a specific resistance of 18.2 MΩ· cm-2 was obtained by reverse osmosis followed by ion-exchange and filtration (RFD 250NB, Toyo Seisakusho Kaisha, Ltd., Japan).
2 Preparation of Graphite OxideGO was prepared from natural graphite by a modified Hummers method. Briefly, graphite powder (10 g) was added to a mixture solution of concentrated H2SO4 (15 mL), K2S2O8 (5 g), and P2O5 (5 g) under the condition of 80 ℃. The resultant mixture was isolated, and cooled down to room temperature. Then the mixture was diluted with distill water (0.75 L) and the product was filtered, washed with distilled water until the filtrate pH become neutral. The product was dried in air at room temperature for 24 h. Subsequently, the preoxidized graphite (2 g) and NaNO3 (1 g) were added to cold concentrated H2SO4 (0 ℃, 46 mL). Then the KMnO4 (6 g) was added gradually with stirring so that the temperature of the mixture was kept below 20 ℃, followed the mixture was stirred at 35 ℃ for 2 h. Distilled water (92 mL) was slowly added to the mixture, and stirred for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by adding distilled water (0.28 L) and H2O2 solution (5 mL, 30%), subsequently. The product was filtered, washed repeatedly with HCl (1:10, v/v) and distilled water until sulfate could not be detected with BaCl2, and then dried in an oven at 60 ℃ for 24 h.
3 Preparation of Pt/RGO and catalyst activity measurementSynthesis of catalysts and measurements of the photocatalytic H2 evolution activity were performed in a sealed Pyrex flask (150 mL) with a flat window (an efficient irradiation area of 10.2 cm2) and a silicone rubber septum for sampling. The amount of hydrogen evolution was measured using gas chromatography (Aglient 6820, TCD, 13x column, Ar carrier). Synthesis of catalysts details and measurements of photocatalytic H2 evolution activity were described as follows (The pH of 10 v/v% TEOA aqueous solution): 2 mL of graphene suspensions (3 mg/mL) was dispersed into 80 mL of TEOA-H2O solution with the ultrasound treatment (25 kHz, 250 W) about 10 minutes, 600 μL of aqueous K2PtCl6 (5 mg/mL) was added and followed by magnetic stirring for 30 min, and then Eosin Y (1×10-3 mol·L-1) was added. The photoreaction dispersion was irradiated under visible light (> 420 nm). The detection of D2 and He were carried out in a GC-MS (Aglient, 5975C, Triple-Axis Detector), a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (LC-D200M), and a Rare Gas Isotope Mass Spectrometry System (Nobleless SFT).
4 Results and discussionFig. 1 present the time curves of products during photocatalytic hydrogen generation. With reaction time increased, the formed hydrogen gradually increased.
Surprisingly, D2 and He were also detected. The formed deuterium and helium were confirmed by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS), a GC-MS (Aglient, 5975C, Triple-Axis Detector), a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (LC-D200M), and a Rare Gas Isotope Mass Spectrometry System (Nobleless SFT) respectively.
The hydrogen was formed by reduction of proton with light excited electron from Br-dye on Pt sties over graphene[10]. Due to the heavy atom effect, the efficiency of hydrogen formation was significantly enhanced[11]. During the reduction of proton by excited electron, the complex of proton and electron is electronic neutral, and this complex can further combine with electron reduced proton, i.e., hydrogen atom to form deuterium and helium. Although the detail mec-hanism of combination of electronic neutral complex with hydrogen atom is unknown, we believe this combination is feasible because the excited electrons can attack H atom and can make the H atom show some kind of electronegativity (denoted by H-). Then the H- combines with H+ to form deuterium, and two D atoms form helium.
We realized that the results reported here raised more questions than provided answers, and that many further works are required on this topic. However, the observation of the generation of He and of D2 from photocatalytic water splitting is very surprising. Evidently, it is necessary to reconsider the quantum mechanics of electrons in such photocatalytic reaction. In addition, some extra questions required further verification: (1) the reaction heat during photocatalytic reaction, (2) some extra particles should be detected, and (3) the specific ratio of helium isotopes should be confirmed. The detail experiments and analysis will be carried out in future.
Acknowledgment: This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21433007 and 21673262) and the 973 Program of Department of Sciences and Technology China (Grant No. 2013CB632404).[1] | Yoshida N, Oh S P, Kitayama T, et al. Early cosmological H ⅱ/He ⅲ regions and their impact on second-generation star formation[J]. Astrophys J, 2007, 663: 687–707. DOI:10.1086/509294 |
[2] | Schaeffer O A, Zähringer J. Solar flare helium in satellite materials[J]. Phys Rev Lett, 1962, 8: 389. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.389 |
[3] | Anglin J D. The relative abundances and energy spectra of solar-flare-accelerated deuterium, tritium, and helium-3[J]. Astrophys J, 1975, 198: 733–753. DOI:10.1086/153651 |
[4] | Möbius E, Hovestadt D, Klecker B, et al. Energy dependence and temporal evolution of the He-3/He-4 ratios in heavy-ion-rich energetic particle events[J]. Astrophy J, 1980, 238: 768–779. DOI:10.1086/158035 |
[5] | Craig H, Clarke W B, Beg M A. Excess 3He in deep water on the east pacific rise[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1975, 26: 125–132. DOI:10.1016/0012-821X(75)90079-5 |
[6] | Hanel R A, Conrath B J, Herath L W, et al. Albedo, Internal Heat, and energy balance of jupiter:preliminary results of the voyager infrared investigation[J]. J Geophys Res, 1981, 86(A10): 8705–8712. DOI:10.1029/JA086iA10p08705 |
[7] | Fleischmann M, Pons S. Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium[J]. J Electroanal Chem Interf Electrochem, 1989, 261: 301–308. DOI:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3 |
[8] | Walling C, Simons J. Two innocent chemists look at cold fusion[J]. J Phys Chem, 1989, 93: 4693–4696. DOI:10.1021/j100349a001 |
[9] | Bush B F, Lagowski J J, Miles M H, et al. Helium production during the electrolysis of D2O in cold fusion experiments[J]. J Electroanal Chem Interf Electrochem, 1991, 304: 271–278. DOI:10.1016/0022-0728(91)85510-V |
[10] | Tian B, Li Z, Zhen W, et al. Uniformly sized (112) facet Co2P on graphene for highly effective photocatalytic hydrogen evolution[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120: 6409–6415. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00680 |
[11] | Zhang X, Lu G. The spin-orbit coupling induced spin flip and its role in the enhancement of the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over iodinated graphene oxide[J]. Carbon, 2016, 108: 215–224. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.022 |